<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: The danger of thinking like it&#8217;s 1985</title> <atom:link href="http://www.anthonydebarros.com/2009/11/23/thinking-like-its-1985/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.anthonydebarros.com/2009/11/23/thinking-like-its-1985/</link> <description>DATA. JOURNALISM. LIFE.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:56:06 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: m.</title><link>http://www.anthonydebarros.com/2009/11/23/thinking-like-its-1985/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link> <dc:creator>m.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 10:19:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonydebarros.com/?p=209#comment-54</guid> <description>Absolute cosign. Same goes for any art form. Think about this: How timeless is Titanic? Seriously. I think that for as &quot;important&quot; a film as that was, DiCaprio probably wouldn&#039;t cite it as his most timeless, and I certainly don&#039;t believe Kate Winslet would. This question actually leads to... Avatar. I have yet to see it, mind you, but I&#039;m telling you right now: It&#039;s no Star Wars.I think the &quot;timeless&quot; aspect of anything also has a lot to do with how fully it impacts the masses. I&#039;m pretty sure you follow me, but it&#039;s not just popularity we&#039;re talking about, but... I&#039; gonna say it... the Zeitgeist of the times.Nirvana impacted the Z word - people were freaking BEGGING for something new. (Even though I think Jane&#039;s Addiction should be getting way more props than they do for that musical revolution) The music of the 60&#039;s did the same thing. It&#039;s about time for something new but... I&#039;m afraid the Z word is less a focused thing right now than it&#039;s ever been. (you know, 3 people used to reach 3,000, now 3,000 reach 3 apiece) Maybe there&#039;s a clue in there somewhere...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolute cosign. Same goes for any art form.<br /> Think about this: How timeless is Titanic? Seriously. I think that for as &#8220;important&#8221; a film as that was, DiCaprio probably wouldn&#8217;t cite it as his most timeless, and I certainly don&#8217;t believe Kate Winslet would. This question actually leads to&#8230; Avatar.<br /> I have yet to see it, mind you, but I&#8217;m telling you right now: It&#8217;s no Star Wars.</p><p>I think the &#8220;timeless&#8221; aspect of anything also has a lot to do with how fully it impacts the masses. I&#8217;m pretty sure you follow me, but it&#8217;s not just popularity we&#8217;re talking about, but&#8230; I&#8217; gonna say it&#8230; the Zeitgeist of the times.</p><p>Nirvana impacted the Z word &#8211; people were freaking BEGGING for something new. (Even though I think Jane&#8217;s Addiction should be getting way more props than they do for that musical revolution) The music of the 60&#8242;s did the same thing. It&#8217;s about time for something new but&#8230; I&#8217;m afraid the Z word is less a focused thing right now than it&#8217;s ever been. (you know, 3 people used to reach 3,000, now 3,000 reach 3 apiece) Maybe there&#8217;s a clue in there somewhere&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mary Hadigan Miller</title><link>http://www.anthonydebarros.com/2009/11/23/thinking-like-its-1985/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link> <dc:creator>Mary Hadigan Miller</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:12:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonydebarros.com/?p=209#comment-17</guid> <description>Tony - I couldn&#039;t agree more - while I was reading I felt like &#039;dancin&#039; on the ceiling!&#039;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony &#8211; I couldn&#8217;t agree more &#8211; while I was reading I felt like &#8216;dancin&#8217; on the ceiling!&#8217;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tweets that mention ANTHONY DeBARROS » The danger of thinking like it’s 1985 -- Topsy.com</title><link>http://www.anthonydebarros.com/2009/11/23/thinking-like-its-1985/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link> <dc:creator>Tweets that mention ANTHONY DeBARROS » The danger of thinking like it’s 1985 -- Topsy.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:18:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonydebarros.com/?p=209#comment-15</guid> <description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Michael Morisy, Anthony DeBarros. Anthony DeBarros said: The danger of thinking like it&#039;s 1985. http://bit.ly/83V9m8 [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Michael Morisy, Anthony DeBarros. Anthony DeBarros said: The danger of thinking like it&#39;s 1985. <a href="http://bit.ly/83V9m8" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/83V9m8</a> [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WordCrafter</title><link>http://www.anthonydebarros.com/2009/11/23/thinking-like-its-1985/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link> <dc:creator>WordCrafter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:58:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonydebarros.com/?p=209#comment-14</guid> <description>I am SOOOOO glad I was born in the &#039;90s.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am SOOOOO glad I was born in the &#8217;90s.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/7 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 238/239 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.anthonydebarros.com @ 2012-02-05 06:17:27 -->
