<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The danger of thinking like it&#8217;s 1985</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anthonydebarros.com/2009/11/23/thinking-like-its-1985/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anthonydebarros.com/2009/11/23/thinking-like-its-1985/</link>
	<description>Changing the course of a river</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:51:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: m.</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonydebarros.com/2009/11/23/thinking-like-its-1985/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>m.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 10:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonydebarros.com/?p=209#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Absolute cosign. Same goes for any art form. 
Think about this: How timeless is Titanic? Seriously. I think that for as &quot;important&quot; a film as that was, DiCaprio probably wouldn&#039;t cite it as his most timeless, and I certainly don&#039;t believe Kate Winslet would. This question actually leads to... Avatar. 
I have yet to see it, mind you, but I&#039;m telling you right now: It&#039;s no Star Wars.

I think the &quot;timeless&quot; aspect of anything also has a lot to do with how fully it impacts the masses. I&#039;m pretty sure you follow me, but it&#039;s not just popularity we&#039;re talking about, but... I&#039; gonna say it... the Zeitgeist of the times. 

Nirvana impacted the Z word - people were freaking BEGGING for something new. (Even though I think Jane&#039;s Addiction should be getting way more props than they do for that musical revolution) The music of the 60&#039;s did the same thing. It&#039;s about time for something new but... I&#039;m afraid the Z word is less a focused thing right now than it&#039;s ever been. (you know, 3 people used to reach 3,000, now 3,000 reach 3 apiece) Maybe there&#039;s a clue in there somewhere...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolute cosign. Same goes for any art form.<br />
Think about this: How timeless is Titanic? Seriously. I think that for as &#8220;important&#8221; a film as that was, DiCaprio probably wouldn&#8217;t cite it as his most timeless, and I certainly don&#8217;t believe Kate Winslet would. This question actually leads to&#8230; Avatar.<br />
I have yet to see it, mind you, but I&#8217;m telling you right now: It&#8217;s no Star Wars.</p>
<p>I think the &#8220;timeless&#8221; aspect of anything also has a lot to do with how fully it impacts the masses. I&#8217;m pretty sure you follow me, but it&#8217;s not just popularity we&#8217;re talking about, but&#8230; I&#8217; gonna say it&#8230; the Zeitgeist of the times. </p>
<p>Nirvana impacted the Z word &#8211; people were freaking BEGGING for something new. (Even though I think Jane&#8217;s Addiction should be getting way more props than they do for that musical revolution) The music of the 60&#8217;s did the same thing. It&#8217;s about time for something new but&#8230; I&#8217;m afraid the Z word is less a focused thing right now than it&#8217;s ever been. (you know, 3 people used to reach 3,000, now 3,000 reach 3 apiece) Maybe there&#8217;s a clue in there somewhere&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Hadigan Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonydebarros.com/2009/11/23/thinking-like-its-1985/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Hadigan Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonydebarros.com/?p=209#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Tony - I couldn&#039;t agree more - while I was reading I felt like &#039;dancin&#039; on the ceiling!&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony &#8211; I couldn&#8217;t agree more &#8211; while I was reading I felt like &#8216;dancin&#8217; on the ceiling!&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention ANTHONY DeBARROS » The danger of thinking like it’s 1985 -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonydebarros.com/2009/11/23/thinking-like-its-1985/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention ANTHONY DeBARROS » The danger of thinking like it’s 1985 -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonydebarros.com/?p=209#comment-15</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Michael Morisy, Anthony DeBarros. Anthony DeBarros said: The danger of thinking like it&#039;s 1985. http://bit.ly/83V9m8 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Michael Morisy, Anthony DeBarros. Anthony DeBarros said: The danger of thinking like it&#39;s 1985. <a href="http://bit.ly/83V9m8" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/83V9m8</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WordCrafter</title>
		<link>http://www.anthonydebarros.com/2009/11/23/thinking-like-its-1985/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>WordCrafter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anthonydebarros.com/?p=209#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I am SOOOOO glad I was born in the &#039;90s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am SOOOOO glad I was born in the &#8217;90s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
